home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: [VOTING] Select All (2nd round)
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1994 20:24:35 +0200 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <199407141735.AA13213@world.std.com> from "Lexicor@world.std.com" at Jul 14, 94 01:35:46 pm
- From: Annius.Groenink@cwi.nl (Annius Groenink)
- X-Face: "E3Hm]k]&:,OEP<{D2ixJf>-9[qOGLebNa0&cQyFL-a~)kTM3&&I"gFw=fJ]K%1IduGjOE`
- ZGu]&~G]QNGa7i/L!+#Xng<|+}HKYHj~5?fTInUEUh0$I1gBI7jrA!&_|e/pR1[cX:^xgJTPsrjA_9
- m8Zli[|.-u{]+c1(6C7mL*m`/_J\>.{4!:g
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- I may have missed the discussion but this vote seems pretty meaningless
- to me. What happened to all the alternative proposals, such as
- swapping Shift/Unshift for Control A? Is this just to shake Timothy
- Miller off? I believe we already have. Everyone who's still on the
- list doesn't really *object* to Control A, but some of us find
- Shift Control A an attractive choice. I am such a person. What am I
- supposed to vote for? Conservative (i.e. a YES on the first proposal)
- would mean no effort in changing my software, Progressive (i.e. a NO on
- both because swapping shift seems to be a wise decision) seems a bit
- strong as I am not really AGAINST the current use of Control A to mean
- select all.
-
-
- --
- Annius V. Groenink | avg@cwi.nl | Private/Edith/ZFC:
- CWI, Kruislaan 413 | A.V.Groenink@zfc.nl | P.O. Box 12079
- 1098 SJ Amsterdam | Room M233 ext. 4077 | NL 1100 AB Amsterdam
- The Netherlands | Phone: +31 20 592 4077 | Phone: +31 20 695 9901
-